The problem: cutting blind is a gamble
SIEM ingest costs keep climbing, and the obvious lever is cutting log volume. But the SOC owns the detections running on those logs, and a blind cut can silently break one. Nothing fails at the moment of the cut. You find out later, when a detection you counted on does not fire during a real incident.
The stakes keep rising. As the SOC leans harder on AI, there are more detections, more automation, and more dependence on data being complete and trusted. The team has to take out cost without gambling coverage, and prove coverage held rather than hope it did.
What's inside
- 01Why cutting blind is a gambleA blind cut can silently break a detection, and you find out during a real incident
- 02Proof, not faithEach reduction is checked against your live detections before anything ships
- 03How it worksRead, Protect, Prove
- 04Where Detection Integrity adds valueCutting the SIEM bill, proving coverage held, weighing what detections cost, keeping protection current